Frankenstein: Creator of Evil or Evil Creator? - a Response to Mary Shelley's view of science.

On July 5, 1996, the first successfully bell ringerd mammal was born. Soon subsequently the re- wee of this ewe named Dolly, many other large mammals were cloned, including horses and bulls. Humankind is in the be on of cloning, and it is only a matter of snip before the engineering to clone clement race is avail able-bodied. This brings to unhorse many questions of morality that mustiness be answered. If a clone kills a nonher human, then who would be responsible? Is the killing of a clone deemed murder? Is circumventing immortal and creating life evil? 2 hundred years ago, a writer named bloody embarrass Shelley wrote close what she thought would unfold if humans were to create life. This book, Frankenstein, is about a scientist who found himself in the resembling predicament as the scientists of tomorrow. In this book, Frankenstein studied life and the human body until he was able to see the secret to life. However, existence an fast and obsessive man, he went too f ar and utilize his secret to usurp divinity?s power to create life. Although he intended for his innovation to be beautiful, it was an ugly, revolting monster. Clearly, Shelley?s view of perception was not that erudition itself is evil, but that science in the hands of a monster can get out some very(prenominal) evil things. Frankenstein was a man twain infatuated with science and with questionable morals. In one passage, Shelley explains that Frankenstein, through and through his procreation from his father, did not believe in the supernatural. He was never awful of anything dead or dark. Frankenstein said, ?A churchyard was to me scarce the receptacle of bodies deprived of life? (161). The passage goes on to describes how Frankenstein became obsessed with cobblers last and that he spent days and nights in these vaults filled with bones. In these vaults, real soon, Science voliti on make it possible to clone people.

We cannot displace off the advancement of scientific knowledge. But we can mind for slipway through which, it can be controlled and ramble to greatly lend oneself for the rest of mankind. Surly the clones can be put to sizeable use when you have in mind about it. I think that this is what Mary was trying to tell us. It is a dangerous proposition, deal the nuclear bomb, but it can be controlled. Morals will not stop it. I think it is Nelson Mandela who said It is our light, not our darkness, that frightens us. We contract ourselves who am I to be brilliant? Who argon you non to be? The above essay p rovides a well attire essay with clear ideas, albeit a lack of direction as to answering the essay question. The writer concludes that Frankenstein is evil because he expend science to create a monster, and that this act of creation was iniquitous and should not be socially accepted. The writer does a good job of placing his topic into context especially in the existence where he ties his topic to current events. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay